Abstract des Autors

After a century of research reports, the notion of exercise-induced cardiac hypertrophy is still an expected adaptation to regular exercise training. Experimental evidence reported both in animals and in humans over the past 3 decades suggests, however, that this conclusion may not be totally warranted. Data from 20 years of echocardiographic investigations of athletes and nonathletes indicate that differences in cardiac dimensions are not very large. Cross-sectional comparisons of over 1000 athletes and roughly 800 control individuals indicate an average difference of 1.6 mm in left ventricular (LV) wall thickness and of 5.3 mm in end-diastolic diameter. Differences reported after training programmes lasting 4 to 52 weeks are even smaller, with average increases of 0.3 mm in LV wall thickness and only 2.1 mm in end-diastolic diameter. This article reviews data from animal and human studies concerning cardiac morphology and exercise training to show that the traditional interpretation of the literature has failed to take into account several methodological considerations or factors that may act as confounders in the interpretation of data. As a result, re-evaluation of the evidence in light or potential confounders indicates that athletes present cardiac dimensions that are proportional to their body size but do not exceed the normal limits. Endurance training induces a modest increase in LV internal diameter which may be explained by increased diastolic filling resulting from resting bradycardia and hypervolaemia. Verf.-Referat