Comparison between the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the category ratio scale (CR-10) for the evaluation of leg exertion

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Vergleich zwischen der Visual-Analogue-Scale (VAS) und der Category-Ratio-Scale (CR-10) in der Belastungsmessung der unteren Extremitaet
Autor:Neely, G.; Ljunggren, G.; Sylven, C.; Borg, G.
Erschienen in:International journal of sports medicine
Veröffentlicht:13 (1992), 2, S. 133-136, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (online)
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0172-4622, 1439-3964
DOI:10.1055/s-2007-1021244
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU199208057249
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

Perceptual ratings given on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Category Ratio Scale (CR-10) were compared in 24 healthy male volunteers (18-39 years) subjected to an exercise test using a bicycle ergometer. Ratings of leg exertion were made by means of the CR-10, the VAS and, as a complementary measure, the method of free magnitude estimation (ME). Blood lactate levels (BL) and heart rates (HR) were used as correlates to sensory perception. The correlation between the CR-10 ratings and BL at 180 W were .59 (p<.01), and between VAS ratings and BL .45 (p<.05). The corresponding correlations with HR were .64 (p<0.01) and .58 (p<0.01), respectively. No significant correlation was found for ME. It was concluded that both the CR-10 and the VAS scales were found to be useful for the psychophysical estimation of perceptual intensities. The CR-10 scale appeared to be slightly more efficient than the VAS and both these methods much better than ME. The advantage of the CR-10 scale might be due to a greater ability to discriminate at high intensity levels. Verf.-Referat