Comparison between the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the category ratio scale (CR-10) for the evaluation of leg exertion
Deutscher übersetzter Titel: | Vergleich zwischen der Visual-Analogue-Scale (VAS) und der Category-Ratio-Scale (CR-10) in der Belastungsmessung der unteren Extremitaet |
---|---|
Autor: | Neely, G.; Ljunggren, G.; Sylven, C.; Borg, G. |
Erschienen in: | International journal of sports medicine |
Veröffentlicht: | 13 (1992), 2, S. 133-136, Lit. |
Format: | Literatur (SPOLIT) |
Publikationstyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
Medienart: | Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (online) |
Sprache: | Englisch |
ISSN: | 0172-4622, 1439-3964 |
DOI: | 10.1055/s-2007-1021244 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online Zugang: | |
Erfassungsnummer: | PU199208057249 |
Quelle: | BISp |
Abstract
Perceptual ratings given on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Category Ratio Scale (CR-10) were compared in 24 healthy male volunteers (18-39 years) subjected to an exercise test using a bicycle ergometer. Ratings of leg exertion were made by means of the CR-10, the VAS and, as a complementary measure, the method of free magnitude estimation (ME). Blood lactate levels (BL) and heart rates (HR) were used as correlates to sensory perception. The correlation between the CR-10 ratings and BL at 180 W were .59 (p<.01), and between VAS ratings and BL .45 (p<.05). The corresponding correlations with HR were .64 (p<0.01) and .58 (p<0.01), respectively. No significant correlation was found for ME. It was concluded that both the CR-10 and the VAS scales were found to be useful for the psychophysical estimation of perceptual intensities. The CR-10 scale appeared to be slightly more efficient than the VAS and both these methods much better than ME. The advantage of the CR-10 scale might be due to a greater ability to discriminate at high intensity levels. Verf.-Referat