Abstract

Isokinetic strength testing has been widely used to assess athletic populations. The purpose of this study was to measure isokinetic strength in nonathletic able-bodied subjects to provide a subsequent comparison with nonathletic injured patients. Using a standard isokinetic protocol, with continuous verbal encouragement, a single investigator tested 16 women and nine men aged 20 to 30 years on an isokinetic dynamometer. Subjects had minimal athletic experience, and none were varsity performers. Peak torque as a percentage of body weight was statistically greater for men than for women in most joints tested both at 60 degrees and 180 degrees per second. The ratio of the last five to the first five of 25 repetitions at 180 degrees/second (Endurance Ratio = ER) rarely (ie, 5/154 tests) fell below the commonly accepted value of 50. Many subjects had an endurance ratio of 100 or greater (range 4 to 171). Peak torques were well below and endurance ratios well above those published for similarly aged athletes. The results suggest that before isokinetic testing is considered as a possible way to distinguish malingerers among injured patients, normal values in an age-matched, nonathletic, working population should be clearly defined. The endurance ratio may reflect the level of athletic training or the level of vigorous participation in an exercise program. Verf.-Referat